Journal of Radio Electronics. eISSN 1684-1719. 2024. ¹12

Contents

Full text in Russian (pdf)

Russian page

 

 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30898/1684-1719.2024.12.15

 

 

 

RESULTS OF VELOCITY ANALYSIS
OF ECDP EXPERIMENTAL DATA IN THE PERMAFROST ZONE

 

O.A. Gulevich1,2, L.B. Volkomirskaya1, E.P. Kaygorodov3

 

1 Pushkov Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere and Radio Wave Propagation, RAS
108840, Russia, Moscow, Troitsk, Kaluzhskoe shosse, 4

2 Timer LLC,
108840, Russia, Moscow, Troitsk, Lesnaya 4B, ,

3 Shpilman Research and Analytical Centre for the Rational Use of the Subsoil,
625026, Russia, Tyumen, Malygina, 75

 

The paper was received July 29, 2024.

 

Abstract. An electromagnetic velocity analysis was performed on the experimental data of the method of reflected electromagnetic waves with a variable offset distance between the receiver and transmitter (ECDP), which was obtained on the territory of the Mirninsky ulus of the Republic of Sakha, Yakutia, Russia in 2023. Based on the velocity analysis data, a geophysical model of the section at the CDP point was obtained performing the electrical resistivity dependent on depth – a “virtual well” 500 meters deep. The prospects for use ECDP method to identify low-contrast anomalies and geological objects in the upper part of the section are discussed.

Key words: ECDP, electromagnetic CDP, deep GPR, electrical resistivity, virtual well.

Corresponding author: Gulevich Oxana Aleksandrovna, o.a.gulevich@gmail.com

References

1. Aleksanova E.D. et al. Electrical exploration: a manual on electrical exploration practice for students of geophysical specialties // Edited by V. K. Khmelevsky, I.N. Modin, A.G. Yakovlev. Moscow – 2005. (In Russian)

2. Gulevich O.A. Pulsed Ultra-Wideband Electromagnetic Sounding of Natural & Technogenic Environment with Dispersion: äèñ. – Ph. D. Thesis, Moscow. (in Russian), 2015.

3. Volkomirskaya L.B. et al. Deep georadiolocation //J. Radio Electron. – 2019. – ¹. 4. https://doi.org/10.30898/1684-1719.2019.4.6 (In Russian)

4. Volkomirskaya L.B. et al. Impact of signal registration technology on GPR data //Engineering and Mining Geophysics 2021. – European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 2021. – Ò. 2021. – ¹. 1. – Ñ. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202152005 (In Russian)

5. Kilpio E.Y., Shcherbakov I.A. On the Results in Physics Obtained in 2020‒2021 //Doklady Physics. – Moscow: Pleiades Publishing, 2022. – Ò. 67. – ¹. 10. – Ñ. 377-404. https://doi.org/10.31857/S2686740022070069 (In Russian)

6. Dolgikh Y.N. et al. The reflected electromagnetic wave CDP method (ECDP) testing results and possibilities for the future oil and gas exploration //Tyumen 2021. – European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 2021. – Ò. 2021. – ¹. 1. – Ñ. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202150007

7. Volkomirskaya L.B., Gulevich O.A. Method for deep georadar and device for implementation thereof. Patent for invention No. RU2816128C1 dated March 26, 2024. (In Russian)

8. Alpin L.M., Dayev D.S., Karinsky A.D. Theory of fields employed in geophysical prospecting //Nedra, Moscow. – 1985. (In Russian)

9. Gulevich O. et al. Typical effects of the registration technology implemented in the GPR receiver //NSG2021 27th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics. – European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 2021. – Ò. 2021. – ¹. 1. – Ñ. 1-5. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202120153

For citation:

Gulevich O.A., Volkomirskaya L.B., Kaygorodov E.P. Results of velocity analysis of ECDP experimental data in the permafrost zone. // Journal of Radio Electronics. – 2024. – ¹. 12. https://doi.org/10.30898/1684-1719.2024.12.15 (In Russian)