Journal of Radio Electronics. eISSN 1684-1719. 2026. ¹6
Full text in Russian (pdf)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30898/1684-1719.2026.6.6
A MATHEMATICAL MODEL OF THE COLPITTS OSCILLATOR
FOR THE ANALYSIS OF ELECTROMAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY
AND PHASE STABILITY OF SELF-OSCILLATING CIRCUITS
P.S. Glazunov ¹, A.I. Grinko ², L.S. Bolotnikov ², V.A. Vdovin ¹, V.A. Cherepenin ¹
¹ Kotelnikov IRE RAS, 125009, Moscow, Mokhovaya St., 11, b. 7.
² Bauman Moscow State Technical University, 105005, Moscow, 2nd Baumanskaya St., 5.
The paper was received June 17, 2026.
Abstract. A mathematical model of the Colpitts oscillator is proposed based on a system of differential equations describing the dynamics of a self-oscillating circuit with allowance for parasitic electromotive forces induced by an external electromagnetic field in various loops of the circuit. The relevance of the study is determined by the increasing complexity of the modern electromagnetic environment and the miniaturization of electronic components, which leads to a reduction in their interference immunity. It is shown that short-term pulsed interference can cause a phase shift in the oscillator’s oscillations. It is established that the magnitude of this phase shift depends on the amplitude of the interference, the time of its application, and the loop into which it is introduced. Numerical experiments are used to identify the most vulnerable parts of the circuit, which can be applied in the design of interference-resistant self-oscillating circuits and in the optimization of their topology.
Key words: electromagnetic compatibility, Colpitts oscillator, self-oscillating circuit, phase shift, electromagnetic susceptibility, pulsed interference, numerical simulation.
Financing: The work was carried out under a state assignment from the Kotelnikov Institute of Radioengineering and Electronics of Russian Academy of Sciences.
Corresponding author: Vladimir Alexandrovich Vdovin, vdv@cplire.ru
References
1. Abdelnaby K. M. et al. The Intelligent Home: A Systematic Review of Technological Pillars, Emerging Paradigms, and Future Directions. Symmetry, 2026. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym18050718
2. Pink S. et al. (eds.). Everyday Automation: Experiencing and Anticipating Emerging Technologies. Routledge, 2022. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003170884
3. Tsallis C. et al. Industrial Wireless Networks in Industry 4.0: A Systematic Review. Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks, 2026, Vol. 15, No. 1, p. 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/jsan15010007
4. Underberg L. et al. Towards Wireless Communications in Automation: An Overview. 2024 IEEE 35th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC). IEEE, 2024, pp. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/PIMRC59610.2024.10817208
5. Pahlavan K. Understanding of RF Cloud Interference Measurement and Modeling. International Journal of Wireless Information Networks, 2022, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 206–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10776-021-00541-8
6. Brunner H. et al. Understanding and Mitigating the Impact of Wi-Fi 6E Interference on Ultra-Wideband Communications and Ranging. 2022 21st ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN). IEEE, 2022, pp. 92–104. https://doi.org/10.1109/IPSN54338.2022.00015
7. Taha H., Vári P., Nagy S. On the Challenges of Mutual Interference between Cable Television Networks and Mobile Fixed Communication Networks in the Digital Dividend Bands. Infocommunications Journal, 2022, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 63–71. https://doi.org/10.36244/ICJ.2022.3.8
8. Adekogba G. V., Adedeji K. B., Olasoji Y. O. Interference Reduction Scheme for Femtocell Ultra-Dense Network: Concept and Research Challenges. ITEGAM-JETIA, 2024, Vol. 10, No. 49, pp. 144–158. https://doi.org/10.5935/jetia.v10i49.1125
9. Liu Y. H., Ku C. P., Chiueh T. D. Design and Implementation of a 5G NR Transmitter With Wi-Fi Coexistence by Beamforming and Power Control. IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society, 2024, Vol. 5, pp. 2132–2144. https://doi.org/10.1109/OJCOMS.2024.3381978
10. Li P., Liu D. Efficient Beam Selection and Resource Allocation Scheme for WiFi and 5G Coexistence at Unlicensed Millimetre-Wave Bands. IET Communications, 2020, Vol. 14, No. 17, pp. 2944–2952. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-com.2019.0746
11. Hoang T. M., Vahid A. Localization-Based 5G NR-Compliant Beam Management for Coexistence With Incumbents. IEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1109/OJVT.2026.3689802
12. Clavier L. et al. Experimental Evidence for Heavy-Tailed Interference in the IoT. IEEE Communications Letters, 2020, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 692–695. https://doi.org/10.1109/LCOMM.2020.3034430
13. Hassan S. et al. Real-Time Investigation of Cross-Technology Interference in Heterogeneous IoT Networks. IEEE Access, 2023, Vol. 11, pp. 112223–112235. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3321221
14. Abass A. A. A., Anwar H., Alshaheen H. S. A Survey on Interference Mitigation for Wireless Body Area Networks. University of Thi-Qar Journal for Engineering Sciences, 2024, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 92–106. https://doi.org/10.31663/utjes.14.1.671
15. Kaleem M., Devarajan G. G. Energy-Efficient Classification Strategy for Detecting Interference and Malicious Sensor Nodes in Wireless Body Area Networks. Cyber Security and Applications, 2024, Vol. 2, p. 100048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csa.2024.100048
16. Rostamikafaki Z., Chan F., D’amours C. Measurement-Based Analysis of 5G Cellular Network Interference on Radar Altimeters and Joint Power-Angle Control Mitigation Strategy. IEEE Access, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3582024
17. Bai J., Yuan S., Duan Z. Research on the Interference Effects of 5G’s Key Parameters on Radio Altimeters. Aerospace, 2024, Vol. 12, No. 1, p. 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12010016
18. Watanabe K. et al. Electromagnetic Interference With the Mobile Communication Devices in Unmanned Aerial Vehicles and Its Countermeasures. IEEE Access, 2024, Vol. 12, pp. 11642–11652. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3351216
19. Petrov G., Stancheva A. Problems Related to EMC Caused by Low-Altitude Flying Drones in Urban Environment. Electrotechnica & Electronica (E+E), 2020, Vol. 55. URL:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362431119_Problems_related_to_EMC_caused_by_low-altitude_flying_drones_in_urban_environment
20. Li J., Kong L., Chu M. Analysis of the Impact of Electromagnetic Fields on UAV Flight Control Systems in EHV–UHV DC Overhead Transmission Lines. AIP Advances, 2024, Vol. 14, No. 8. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0225258
21. Dionísio R., Lolić T., Torres P. Electromagnetic Interference Analysis of Industrial IoT Networks: From Legacy Systems to 5G. 2020 IEEE Microwave Theory and Techniques in Wireless Communications (MTTW). IEEE, 2020, Vol. 1, pp. 41–46. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTTW51045.2020.9245057
22. Siddiqui M. U. A. et al. URLLC in Beyond 5G and 6G Networks: An Interference Management Perspective. IEEE Access, 2023, Vol. 11, pp. 54639–54663. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3282363
23. Banafaa M. K. et al. A Comprehensive Survey on 5G-and-Beyond Networks With UAVs: Applications, Emerging Technologies, Regulatory Aspects, Research Trends and Challenges. IEEE Access, 2024, Vol. 12, pp. 7786–7826. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3349208
24. Wang Y. H., Li C. C. Highly Effective EMI Shielding Composites for 5G Ka-Band Frequencies. Applied Materials Today, 2024, Vol. 36, p. 102041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2023.102041
25. Yuan L. et al. EMI Challenges in Modern Power Electronic-Based Converters: Recent Advances and Mitigation Techniques. Frontiers in Electronics, 2023, Vol. 4, p. 1274258. https://doi.org/10.3389/felec.2023.1274258
26. Liu G. et al. Electromagnetic Immunity Performance of Intelligent Electronic Equipment in Smart Substation’s Electromagnetic Environment. Energies, 2020, Vol. 13, No. 5, p. 1130. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13051130
27. Angelov G. V., Nikolov D. N., Hristov M. H. Technology and Modeling of Nonclassical Transistor Devices. Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2019, Vol. 2019, No. 1, p. 4792461. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4792461
28. Chen X., Touba N. A. Fundamentals of CMOS Design. Electronic Design Automation. Morgan Kaufmann, 2009, pp. 39–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374364-0.50009-6
29. Bespalov V. A., Dyuzhev N. A., Kireev V. Y. Possibilities and Limitations of CMOS Technology for the Production of Various Microelectronic Systems and Devices. Nanobiotechnology Reports, 2022, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 24–38. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2635167622010037
30. White M. Scaled CMOS Technology Reliability Users Guide. Pasadena, California: Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 2010. JPL Publication 09-33. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1441.5525
31. Wang M. A Review of Reliability in Gate-All-Around Nanosheet Devices. Micromachines, 2024, Vol. 15, No. 2, p. 269. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi15020269
32. Liu T. W. et al. Reliability Challenges of Gate Dielectric Materials in Transistors. Information & Functional Materials, 2025, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 62–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/ifm2.31
33. Ghfiri C. Development and Validation of a Predictive Model to Ensure the Long-Term Electromagnetic Compatibility of Embedded Electronic Systems. PhD thesis. INSA de Toulouse, 2017. URL: https://theses.hal.science/tel-02062116/
34. Kumari N. A., Sreenivasulu V. B., Prithvi P. Impact of Scaling on Nanosheet FET and CMOS Circuit Applications. ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology, 2023, Vol. 12, No. 3, p. 033001. https://doi.org/10.1149/2162-8777/acbcf2
35. National Transportation Safety Board. Aircraft Accident Report. URL:https://data.ntsb.gov/carol-repgen/api/Aviation/ReportMain/GenerateNewestReport/10750/pdf
36. Morant A. et al. Railway EMI Impact on Train Operation and Environment. International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility – EMC EUROPE. IEEE, 2012, pp. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMCEurope.2012.6396847
37. North American Electric Reliability Corporation. 1989 Quebec Disturbance Report. URL:https://www.nerc.com/globalassets/programs/rapa/gmd/reference-documents/nerc_1989-quebec-disturbance_report.pdf
38. Bolduc L. GIC Observations and Studies in the Hydro-Québec Power System. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 2002, Vol. 64, No. 16, pp. 1793–1802. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6826(02)00128-1
39. Singapore Exchange. News Release BCOI Report. URL: https://links.sgx.com/FileOpen/20150624_News_Release_BCOI_report.ashx?App=ArchiveAnnouncement&FileID=357241&AnncID=5NDW88WZ0QVNLLAT
40. Pulkkinen A. et al. Geomagnetic Storm of 29–31 October 2003: Geomagnetically Induced Currents and Their Relation to Problems in the Swedish High-Voltage Power Transmission System. Space Weather, 2005, Vol. 3, No. 8. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004SW000123
41. North American Electric Reliability Corporation. Transient-Induced Misoperation Approach II. URL: https://www.nerc.com/globalassets/programs/event-analysis/lessons-learned/ll20210204_transient_induced_misoperation_approach_ii.pdf
42. Lodwig S. G., Schuetz C. C. Coupling to Control Cables in HV Substations. 2001 IEEE EMC International Symposium. Symposium Record. International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility. IEEE, 2001, Vol. 1, pp. 249–253. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEMC.2001.950621
43. de Medeiros L. H. A. et al. High Frequency Transients and Electromagnetic Interference Within 69 kV Substations. Electric Power Systems Research, 2011, Vol. 81, No. 7, pp. 1534–1540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2011.03.009
44. Keskar P. Y. Analysis of Lightning-Related Damages to Instrumentation and Control Systems for Water and Wastewater Plants. ISA Transactions, 1996, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0019-0578(96)00002-X
45. Prekodravac Filipovic J. et al. Electromagnetic Interference in the Modern Era: Concerns, Trends, and Nanomaterial-Based Solutions. Nanomaterials, 2025, Vol. 15, No. 20, p. 1558. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15201558
46. Pradip Pawar. Global EMI Shielding Market Size, Industry Share, Growth Trends & Forecast 2026-2034. URL: https://www.verifiedmarketreports.com/product/emi-shielding-market/
47. 47. EMI Shielding Market (Material: Conductive Polymers, Conductive Coatings and Paints, EMC/EMI Filters, Metal Shielding Product, and Others) - Global Industry Analysis, Size, Share, Growth, Trends, and Forecast, 2022-2031. URL: https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/emi-shielding-market.html
48. Williams T. EMC for Product Designers. Newnes, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7506-8170-4.X5000-2
49. IEC/TR 62433-2-1:2010. EMC IC Modelling – Part 2-1: Theory of Black Box Modelling for Conducted Emission. Technical report. International Electrotechnical Commission, 2010. URL:https://cdn.standards.iteh.ai/samples/17948/6ad242729241471db3f5b96db2e01f16/IEC-TR-62433-2-1-2010.pdf
50. SAE/EIA-STD-656-B. High Speed TDM Data Bus: HSTDB. Standard. Society of Automotive Engineers; Electronic Industries Alliance. URL: https://ibis.org/ver4.2/ver4_2.pdf
51. IEC TS 62404:2007. Logic Digital Integrated Circuits – Specification for I/O Interface Model for Integrated Circuit (IMIC Version 1.3). Technical specification. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission, 2007. URL:https://cdn.standards.iteh.ai/samples/13353/a429219327ca44bd9459c743e7cb3f62/IEC-TS-62404-2007.pdf
52. IEC 62433-2:2017. EMC IC Modelling – Part 2: Models of Integrated Circuits for EMI Behavioural Simulation – Conducted Emissions Modelling (ICEM-CE). International standard. International Electrotechnical Commission, 2017. URL:https://cdn.standards.iteh.ai/samples/22575/7eb90dcf3388418c9cb890c1702de052/IEC-62433-2-2017.pdf
53. Ghfiri C. et al. A New Methodology to Build the Internal Activity Block of ICEM-CE for Complex Integrated Circuits. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2017, Vol. 60, No. 5, pp. 1500–1509. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEMC.2017.2767084
54. IEC 62433-3:2017. EMC IC Modelling – Part 3: Models of Integrated Circuits for EMI Behavioural Simulation – Radiated Emissions Modelling (ICEM-RE). International standard. International Electrotechnical Commission, 2017. URL:https://cdn.standards.iteh.ai/samples/21777/deb4e85c97b34121a651e971f036e870/IEC-62433-3-2017.pdf
55. IEC/PAS 62433-4:2007. EMC IC Modelling – Part 4: Models of Integrated Circuits for EMI Behavioural Simulation – Conducted Immunity Modelling (ICIM-CI). Publicly available specification. International Electrotechnical Commission, 2007. URL:https://cdn.standards.iteh.ai/samples/21778/77925e80d2664cbe80a74c9428a0ac0b/IEC-62433-4-2016.pdf
56. IEC/TS 62433-6:2013. EMC IC Modelling – Part 6: Models of Integrated Circuits for EMI Behavioural Simulation – Conducted Immunity Modelling (ICIM-CI) – Pulse Immunity. Technical specification. International Electrotechnical Commission, 2013. URL:https://cdn.standards.iteh.ai/samples/100202/3a353032f5d54136926c4e4b3acfb719/IEC-62433-6-2020.pdf
57. Ramdani M. et al. The Electromagnetic Compatibility of Integrated Circuits – Past, Present, and Future. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2009, Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 78–100. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEMC.2008.2008907
58. Chen X., Xie S., Wei M. Conduction Immunity Modeling Approach for Nonlinear IB Module Based on Multi-Harmonic Distortion Theory in Analog-Digital Integrated Circuit (MADIC). IEICE Electronics Express, 2024, Vol. 21, No. 19, pp. 20240324–20240324. https://doi.org/10.1587/elex.21.20240324
59. Machado M. B. et al. Analysis and Design of a Fully Integrated Colpitts Oscillator Operating at Ultra-Low Voltages. Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing, 2015, Vol. 85, No. 1, pp. 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10470-015-0581-4
60. Li L. et al. Low Phase Noise, Dual-Frequency Pierce MEMS Oscillators With Direct Print Additively Manufactured Amplifier Circuits. Micromachines, 2025, Vol. 16, No. 7, p. 755. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16070755
61. Naing T. L. et al. Low-Power MEMS-Based Pierce Oscillator Using a 61-MHz Capacitive-Gap Disk Resonator. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 2020, Vol. 67, No. 7, pp. 1377–1391. https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2020.2969530
62. Wu Z. Z. et al. A Low Phase-Noise Pierce Oscillator Using a Piezoelectric-on-Silica Micromechanical Resonator. 2013 Transducers & Eurosensors XXVII: The 17th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems (TRANSDUCERS & EUROSENSORS XXVII). IEEE, 2013, pp. 490–493. https://doi.org/10.1109/Transducers.2013.6626810
63. Zhang Z. et al. On the DC-Settling Process of the Pierce Crystal Oscillator in Start-Up. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs, 2022, Vol. 70, No. 1, pp. 26–30. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSII.2022.3209025
64. Cirjulina D. et al. Nonlinear Dynamics and Hybrid Synchronization of DC-Biased Colpitts Chaotic Oscillators. Electronics, 2025, Vol. 14, No. 20, p. 4005. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14204005
65. Cirjulina D. et al. Experimental Study on Colpitts Chaotic Oscillator-Based Communication System Application for the Internet of Things. Applied Sciences, 2024, Vol. 14, No. 3, p. 1180. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14031180
66. Maggio G. M., De Feo O., Kennedy M. P. Nonlinear Analysis of the Colpitts Oscillator and Applications to Design. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Fundamental Theory and Applications, 2002, Vol. 46, No. 9, pp. 1118–1130. https://doi.org/10.1109/81.788813
67. Karimi-Bidhendi A., Pu H., Heydari P. Study and Design of a Fast Start-Up Crystal Oscillator Using Precise Dithered Injection and Active Inductance. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 2019, Vol. 54, No. 9, pp. 2543–2554. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSSC.2019.2920084
68. Pankratz E., Sánchez-Sinencio E. Survey of Integrated-Circuit-Oscillator Phase-Noise Analysis. International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications, 2014, Vol. 42, No. 9, pp. 871–938. https://doi.org/10.1002/cta.1890
69. Maffezzoni P., D’Amore D. Time-Domain Analysis of Phase Noise and Jitter in Oscillators Due to White and Colored Noise Sources. International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications, 2012, Vol. 40, No. 10, pp. 999–1018. https://doi.org/10.1002/cta.768
70. Demir A., Mehrotra A., Roychowdhury J. Phase Noise in Oscillators: A Unifying Theory and Numerical Methods for Characterisation. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Design Automation Conference, 1998, pp. 26–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/277044.277050
71. Glazunov P. S., Saletskii A. M., Vdovin V. A. Investigation of the Impact of Pulsed Electromagnetic Interference on the Stability of Ring Generators //Journal of Communications Technology and Electronics. – 2022. – Ò. 67. – ¹. 8. – Ñ. 1030-1038. https://doi.org/10.1134/s1064226922080058
72. Glazunov P. et al. Modeling the Influence of Electromagnetic Interference on Failures in the Operation of Clock Generators //2020 7th All-Russian Microwave Conference (RMC). – IEEE, 2020. – Ñ. 273-275. https://doi.org/10.1109/RMC50626.2020.9312353
For citation:
Glazunov P.S., Grinko A.I., Bolotnikov L.S., Vdovin V.A., Cherepenin V.A. A mathematical model of the Colpitts oscillator for the analysis of electromagnetic susceptibility and phase stability of self-oscillating circuits // Journal of Radioelectronics. – 2026. – ¹. 6. https://doi.org/10.30898/1684-1719.2026.6.6 (In Russian)